The Synod and Alice’s New Adventures in Wonderland

Artist: © Ben Savet

Artist: © Ben Savet

The story which follows was inspired by a strange meeting of the absurdist wisdom of Lewis Carroll and my own wondering about three of the many articles about the Synod on the Family in Rome, Pope Francis’ recent visit to the US, and the persistent questions about women in the Catholic Church, writes Alice Priest.

BY Alice Priest*

The story which follows, “The Synod and Alice’s New Adventures in Wonderland”, was inspired by a strange meeting of the absurdist wisdom of Lewis Carroll and my own wondering about three of the multitude of articles in both Catholic and wider circles, about the present Synod on the Family in Rome (October 4-25, 2015), the recent visit of the Fiat-driving Pope Francis to the United States, and the persistent questions being raised about the leadership and ministry potential of women in the Catholic Church.

Firstly, to coincide with the opening of the Synod, the National Catholic Reporter’s editorial staff in their article “Are we prepared to be surprised by the Spirit?”, speculate about the potential outcomes of the Synod in light of Pope Francis’ use of the imagery of open and closed doors, and then of the surprisingly widening power of the Holy Spirit.

“Pope Francis advocates for a Church with open doors, ‘so that if someone, moved by the Spirit, comes there looking for God, he or she will not find a closed door’. But one door remains firmly shut with a deadbolt securely in place. On women’s ordination, Francis says, ‘That door is closed’.

“…’Not because women do not have the capacity,’ he added. They just can’t…

“A few short hours before, Francis exhorted a million people in the heart of Philadelphia to embrace the surprises the Spirit brings. ‘Here is the surprise,’ Francis said, … ‘Moses and Jesus both rebuke those closest to them for being so narrow! Would that all could be prophets of God’s word!’

“…Later he added: ‘To give the impression that [the working of the Spirit] cannot take place in those who are not ‘part of our group’, who are not ‘like us’, is a dangerous temptation. … It is a perversion of faith!’”

I also considered Joshua J. McElwee’s review of a collection of essays written by 43 women from around the world, titled Catholic Women Speak: Bringing Our Gifts to the Table. It responds to the lack of representation of women at the present Synod. Whilst Pope Francis has appointed 30 women to attend the Synod as auditors making contributions to the discussions, only the 279 male members of the meetings can vote. I was particularly struck by the view taken on Pope Francis’ call for a ‘theology of Woman’ as means to finding a more “incisive” direction for women in the Church.

“Citing Francis’ call in 2013 for the Church to study a theology of womanhood, the editors say ‘such comments reduce women to objects of study, a separate category of reflection’.…’We resist… any suggestion that the Church needs a theology of ‘Woman’ or ‘womanhood’,’ they continue. ‘Rather than a deeper theology of women, we say that the Church needs a deeper theology of the human – a theological anthropology that can be developed only by the full inclusion of women in the process of theological reflection informed by the experiential realities of daily life.’”

Earlier this year Mamamia published an article by Elly Kohistani which presented US Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke’s curious interview with a publication called The New Emangelization, a group that seeks to reinstate manliness to the Church, which they believe is suffering from a “man-crisis”. Cardinal Burke presents the view that “feminism” has obscured the “goodness and importance of men”, and that “radical feminism” is one of the biggest problems facing the Church today.

So, to my wondering about where all this leaves us and where the Synod and the Spirit might take us. Alice follows her curiosity once more into Wonderland…

And yes, I can hear the cries now for me, as for that other Alice who ventured into the Royal Courts of Wonderland, “Off! Off with her head!”


The Synod and Alice’s New Adventures in Wonderland
(with apologies to Lewis Carroll and Disney)

“I’m late, I’m late, for a very important date!” declared the White Rabbit, looking curiously into the distance for his Fiat.

“Oh good”, thought Alice, “a friendly face in this topsy-turvy place I can trust to be frank.”

Alice: “Excuse me, Sir. You seem to know where you’re going. You can give me direction then.”

White Rabbit: “You’d think so, my Dear, but one’s fiat – Yes, indeed, one’s fiat has happened to go in very surprising directions of late. Nevertheless, we must have Patience! Heed the directions and directly you will be directed in the right direction.”

Waiting for directions, Alice’s attention was taken by the tinkling of tea cups.

Alice: “Oh, White Rabbit, look! Over there! It’s a Mad Hatters Tea Party… 279 mad women, all in fancy fascinators! How wonderful. What are they discussing?”

White Rabbit: “Why the nature and role of bishops of course! It’s one of their specialist subjects.”

Alice: “Are any of them bishops?”

White Rabbit: “No, not a single one! What a mad idea!”

Alice: “And who are they, those 30 men, sitting over there with their curious pointy hats on?”

White Rabbit: “Oh they’re just invited to the Tea Party to give it a tea-party atmosphere. They’re bishops. They’re always calling for more tea.”

Alice: “But they don’t have any tea.”

White Rabbit: “Well, you can always have more of nothing. How wonderful for them!”

Not for the first time, Alice was picked up by a gentle wind which whispered to her the direction she should go and she soon found herself in a most beautiful garden, previously obscured by the table of tall-hatted bishops.

“Wait a minute! You can’t be here! Imposter!!” The cries rang out.

Alice: “I’m sure this is just exactly where I belong.”

Orchid: “It’s quite impossible. These are the Royal Ministry Gardens! State your means of arrival!”

Alice: “Why, I came via the warm-wind-that-blows-where-it-will.”

Orchid: “Hurrumph! You are mistaken.”

Laughter filled the garden.

Alice: “It’s really very rude indeed to laugh when one is moved by such a wind, you know.”

Petunia: “Indigestion more likely!”

The Rose: “Just what species or, shall we say, genus are you, my dear?”

Alice: “Well, I guess you would call me… genus, humanus… Alice.”

Daisy: “Ever see an alice with a blossom like that?”

Orchid: “Come to think of it, did you ever see an alice?”

Daisy: “Yes, and did you notice her petals? What a peculiar colour.”

Orchid: (sniffing Alice’s hair) “And so much fragrance.”

The Rose: “We’ll have to do a special ‘alice-study’, and work out just exactly what you are and where your special place is.”

Alice: “But why isn’t it just here with you, now? We’re just the same, …I’m just as mad as you!”

Orchid: “What kind of logic is that!? And with those feet, you’ll trample all over us in no time!”

Daisy: “See all the trouble you started?”

The Rose: “No, no, genus alice, this simply won’t do! Come back again in several years. Dooo come back, but don’t be in a hurry, these things take time…” (yawn)

Alice found herself put out of the garden. The White Rabbit was there, again puzzling over the question of his Fiat, whilst busily opening a series of doors that looked as if they had been closed for A VERY long time. He stopped and looked at her with love.

White Rabbit: “All the doors must be opened!”

But there was one very little door that the White Rabbit seemed unable to get to. Through its tiny keyhole Alice could just spy the Royal Ministry Gardens. But, try as she might, even if this door could be opened, she knew she could only just squeeze the toe of her pink shoe through its opening.

Alice: “Well, I simply must get through!”

Door Knob: “Sorry, you’re much too big. Simply impassible.”

Alice: “You mean impossible?”

Door Knob: “No, impassible. Nothing’s impossible.”

As she stood pondering possible impossibilities a voice perched high on a branch broadcast down.

Cheshire Cat: “Oh, by the way, if you’d really like to know, he went that way.”

Alice: “Who did?”

Cheshire Cat: “The White Rabbit.”

Alice: “Which way?”

Cheshire Cat: “Can you stand on your head?”

Alice: “Oh!”

* Alice Priest is a religious educator with more than 20 years’ experience across a range of settings – from the classroom to youth ministry and teacher education. She has lived and worked in Catholic school systems and ministries in Italy, Germany and Australia. Alice currently enjoys a teaching and chaplaincy role at St Scholastica’s College, Glebe in Sydney.

Artwork: With thanks to Ben Savet

Download a printer-friendly version (PDF 270KB)

The Good Oil, October 20, 2015. If you would like to republish this article, please contact the editor.

15 Responses to “The Synod and Alice’s New Adventures in Wonderland”

  1. thanks Alice for your courage and Creativity. Marie.

  2. Brilliant Alice…..we were hoping to use this in one of our liturgies..if that is okay?

  3. Phil Billington says:

    Stunning, creative and insightful Alice! You are a gift to us as a community – your courageous faith and stunning intellect inspire me! Thank you Alice!

  4. Jane Moore says:

    Dear Alice, I loved this. It is such a creative way to show the blindness and rigidity that plagues the Catholic church on this particular issue. A difficult message communicated with humour and love. Well done.

  5. jim connell says:

    wonderful Alice amazing insight

  6. Terry Clout says:

    We must pray that Pope Francis will be moved by the Spirit to make the impassable possible ASAP

  7. Andrea Dean says:

    Great article Alice, thanks for sharing your creativity, humour and common sense!

  8. Rod Thomson says:

    Thanks Alice! Fiat: “be it done” / “let it be done” … Mary’s words. Very clever. No doubt Frank will eventually find his car / his “Yes!” with the help of the wind. For another interesting reading on dualistic thinking that helps to explain the ‘madness’ of those who need to categorise and legalise everything:

  9. Vicky says:

    Oh I loved reading this, made me laugh and so thankful that there are so many other women who share similar ponderings that I do!

  10. Nanoya Barrett says:

    I loved reading this Alice – humour is still a great way to get a point across. It seems crazy or “mad” to us that few women are attending this synod and no women can vote, but celibate men can decide the way for us. Also great the way the Spirit is called upon to blow open the doors, but only the doors that the Pope and Bishops want opened. No one in the Vatican listens to us women – we are powerless to some extent, but don’t let us become invisible. Let us stand up and be seen. Thank you. Nanoya

  11. Helen Sheehan says:

    Congratulations Alice. A powerful, clever critique. I thoroughly enjoyed your creative approach which brilliantly highlights this ‘madness’. Helen

  12. Marie Casamento says:

    What heart you give us Alice with your ponderings and creativity. You and each of us women who stand in the doorways hoping are indeed Queen of hearts who not only have heart, but take heart and are the indeed the heart of the church of the future. No one can steal that from us. Marie

  13. Pat Hearity says:

    What a creative imaginative narrative ! It screams with truth, ‘ impassable but nothing is impossible ‘ . If Pope Francis’ recent admonition to be a listening church – listening to people ( senses fidelium ) , bishops listening to each other, and Pope listening to all and guided by the Spirit. Wow ! There is hope , and that flickering flame keeps me going despite the Synod being named a ‘ language – fest ‘ by Brisbane’s bishop. Thanks Alice

Leave a Comment

The aim of The Good Oil's comment section is to encourage respectful conversation and dialogue. When posting your comment please:

  • be brief (no more than 120 words) and keep on topic;
  • be respectful of others whether you agree with their opinion or not;
  • be careful about posting your personal information online.

Our comment section is moderated. Your name and email are required for identification purposes. Your email will not be published. We reserve the right to not publish comments.