What are the pressing social needs of our time?

Clare Condon SGS

Clare Condon SGS

Who has a claim on our courage, compassion and commitment today in Australia, asks Good Samaritan Sister, Clare Condon.

BY Clare Condon SGS*

This year the Sisters of Charity are celebrating 175 years of service to the Australian community. The Parramatta Sisters of Mercy are also celebrating a significant milestone: 125 years of service within the broader Sydney community. The story of the contribution of both these religious women’s institutes to the fabric of Australian society is one of courage, compassion and commitment to the poor, especially to women and children.

When the Sisters of Charity arrived in Sydney in 1838, the plight of unemployed immigrant women was deplorable. They were homeless on the streets of Sydney or living in slum-like conditions. The sisters, on their arrival, responded immediately to this need.

My own congregation, the Sisters of the Good Samaritan, began 157 years ago, roughly in between these two groups. We share a common experience from those early years. The early sisters of the three groups ministered in Parramatta at the Female Factory prison, the destination of all unassigned convict women; all three groups were also involved in the Catholic Orphan School, which provided for the numerous orphaned children from the streets of greater Sydney.

In those very early years, the Sisters of Charity established St Vincent’s Hospital, and later went on to establish many hospitals across Australia. All three groups, alongside other religious orders, provided education to the poor and welfare to the most needy. Their legacy in healthcare, education and welfare to the Australian people is well documented.

We religious women who follow in their footsteps stand on the shoulders of giants. They were able to see the needs of their times, respond with the resources they could muster, and do so with energy and zeal.

Since attending the recent celebratory anniversaries for these two congregations of religious women, I have been challenged to reflect on what the pressing social needs are now in a very different Australian society.

In 2014, Australia is a wealthy, multicultural, sophisticated society with one of the world’s best healthcare systems, a comprehensive education system and a strong safety net for those unable to compete in such an environment. So who has a claim on our courage, compassion and commitment today?

My thoughts immediately turn to asylum seekers and immigrants who seek to come to this country to escape destitution and poverty, as did those who came here in the nineteenth century. More significantly, most of today’s refugees are seeking asylum in a country like Australia because of persecution and civil war in their home country. They are seeking protection, safety and security. Their lives, and that of their families, are on the line. Are they not worthy of our commitment, courage and a compassionate response?

But the door of entry to Australia has been closed tightly, blocking them out. We have a government calling this process of blocking – “Stopping the Boats” – a successful policy. I ask: by what criteria? It might be successful in keeping people out, but it is an abject failure in responding to the needs of human beings who are seeking protection; it is an abject failure if you take into account the damage done to children who are held indefinitely in detention with no provision of education; it is an abject failure if it hardens the hearts of Australian citizens.

It seems that governments today endeavour to follow what they perceive to be community sentiment rather than to set community standards and higher values. What is it that characterises Australians who support, and in fact, drive such a government policy? Are we still a racist people, fearful of the stranger?

It would seem that this is so, based on recent research led by Andrew Markus of Monash University which has been tracking changes in Australian attitudes towards immigrants and asylum seekers through a series of national surveys. The latest findings of the “Mapping Social Cohesion Research” released on March 24, 2014 note that barely three per cent of recent migrants describe Australians as “caring, friendly, hospitable”, which is a dramatic drop from a similar survey in the 1990s.

Professor Markus also noted: “Racial discrimination in Australia is not a minor matter. More than 40 per cent of recent arrivals from a number of Asian countries reported experiencing discrimination over the last 12 months”.

For us, then, who wish to follow the gospel call to serve those most in need, we have much to do in responding to those newly arrived migrants and asylum seekers who make it to Australia’s shores. There are still over 30,000 asylum seekers in Australia who have no identity and are unable to work or support themselves.

As members of religious institutes, our role today continues to be one of service. It must also be one of advocacy for a change in a government policy of “Stopping the Boats” which diminishes people, both those seeking asylum and we, the citizens of this nation. We must advocate for a change in attitudes towards the ‘other’ and ‘the stranger’ in our midst. Like our forebears, we must bring our courage, our compassion and our commitment to those who most need it today.

* Sister Clare Condon, the Congregational Leader of the Sisters of the Good Samaritan of the Order of St Benedict, is the recipient of the 2013 Human Rights Medal.

Download a printer-friendly version (PDF 82KB)


The Good Oil, April 15, 2014. If you would like to republish this article, please contact the editor.

2 Responses to “What are the pressing social needs of our time?”

  1. Diana Law sgs says:

    Clare, you search both into the maelstrom of our society and into the religious, socio-political and economic environment which molded Australian Congregations in general and the Good Samaritan one in particular. Your leadership is empowering, all inclusive and focused on the exercise of our charism in our contemporary society.

    I remember looking at the multitude of homeless people released from psychiatric hospitals after the Richmond Report in the 1970’s and thinking: Can I walk away from these people and still call myself a good samaritan? Now, en route for the Assembly, I think we will all be asking ourselves the same question in relationship to that part of our human community, who are presently stigmatized as “refugees” or “asylum seekers” .

  2. Garry says:

    Thanks Clare for identifying a key sign of our times. No one should argue against the plight of asylum seekers.
    I believe there is a second sign of the times that we should attend to as well, both in practical help and through advocacy. This is the plight of many older Australian citizens, who live in loneliness, poverty and sometimes in hopelessness. In the current political and financial climate in Australia, many of our older citizens face the prospect of reduced pensions; reduced health care provisions; increasing costs of living; increased social isolation. Whilst the call for surplus in the budget may sound economically rational, it should not be advocated at the expense of the elderly, especially those in the worst of social circumstances. Our elderly may well be, or become, a new form of asylum seekers!

Leave a Comment

The aim of The Good Oil's comment section is to encourage respectful conversation and dialogue. When posting your comment please:

  • be brief (no more than 120 words) and keep on topic;
  • be respectful of others whether you agree with their opinion or not;
  • be careful about posting your personal information online.

Our comment section is moderated. Your name and email are required for identification purposes. Your email will not be published. We reserve the right to not publish comments.